While not a trial of ARBs as therapy, BRACE CORONA was a randomized controlled trial exploring stopping-versus-continuing ACE inhibitors/ARBs in patients with hypertension. It showed no harm in continuation of ACE inhibitors and ARBs with COVID-19. There was a non-statistically significant hint of a benefit in the ACEi/ARB group but the trial was not powered to detect this.The first randomized controlled trial of an ARB for treatment of COVID-19 returned preliminary results showing possible improvements in time to discharge, need for supplementary oxygen and CRP. See "Telmisartan for treatment of Covid-19 patients: an open randomized clinical trial. Preliminary report." See independent critical appraisal of trial.
Results: "14 of 51 patients (27%) on a twice-daily dose of the drug (n=51) plus standard of care required oxygen therapy at the end of the treatment period vs. 22 of 55 patients (45%) in the control arm. That corresponds to a 40% relative risk reduction, an effect, the company said, that was “statistically significant (p=0.057) at the 10% level as predefined in the statistical analysis plan.".
While not a trial of ARBs as therapy, BRACE CORONA was a randomized controlled trial exploring stopping-versus-continuing ACE inhibitors/ARBs in patients with hypertension. It showed no harm in continuation of ACE inhibitors and ARBs with COVID-19. There was a non-statistically significant hint of a benefit in the ACEi/ARB group but the trial was not powered to detect this.The first randomized controlled trial of an ARB for treatment of COVID-19 returned preliminary results showing possible improvements in time to discharge, need for supplementary oxygen and CRP. See "Telmisartan for treatment of Covid-19 patients: an open randomized clinical trial. Preliminary report." See independent critical appraisal of trial.
Results: "14 of 51 patients (27%) on a twice-daily dose of the drug (n=51) plus standard of care required oxygen therapy at the end of the treatment period vs. 22 of 55 patients (45%) in the control arm. That corresponds to a 40% relative risk reduction, an effect, the company said, that was “statistically significant (p=0.057) at the 10% level as predefined in the statistical analysis plan.".